Body image GÇô a rapid evidence assessment of the literature (PDF)

The views expressed in this report are those of the authors, not necessarily those of the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (nor do they reflect Government policy). NB Research Ltd is an independent research consultancy. More information is available at www.nb- research.co.uk Body image – a rapid evidence assessment of the literature A project on behalf of the Government Equalities Office By Nina Burrowes May 2013  1 Contents Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 4 2. What is associated with body image? 8 3. Who is impacted by negative body image? 16 4. Protection, prevention and improvement 21 5. Conclusion: what does the body image literature indicate? 25 Appendix 1 – Method 27 Appendix 2 – Summary tables for all articles 28  2 Executive Summary Introduction The Government is concerned that people – men, women and children – suffer from negative feelings about their body image and this can influence their wellbeing and self-esteem. As a response, the Government launched the body confidence campaign. This rapid evidence assessment has been commissioned to inform the work of the campaign, focusing on the causes, consequences and potential interventions associated with body image. The term ‘body image’ incorporates themes of body perception (the extent to which an individual has an accurate perception of their body size, shape and weight) and body satisfaction (the extent to which an individual is satisfied with their body size, shape and weight). The aim of this rapid evidence assessment was to provide a broad overview of the body image research using the most robust research evidence available. It should be noted that this rapid evidence assessment suffers with the same limitations as previous literature reviews, including: an over-reliance on correlational studies, a lack of research on certain populations, and insufficient information provided in some research papers. What are the potential causes and consequences of negative body image? The methodology used in the majority of body image research means that it is not possible to robustly establish the precise causes and consequences of negative body image, due to an over- reliance on correlational studies. However, the research indicates that potential causes of negative body image include being overweight or obese; viewing media images of ideal body shapes; the influence of family and peers; and individual psychological factors such as an increased tendency to compare yourself to others. The potential consequences of negative body image include low self- esteem, depression, and the use of unhealthy weight control behaviours (such as crash dieting). Who is impacted by negative body image? Gender is the main factor in establishing who is most impacted by negative body image, with females more likely to have lower body satisfaction than males regardless of age or ethnicity. Negative body image is found across all ages and ethnicities however, it should be noted that there is more research evidence available on younger populations and White populations. What can be done about negative body image? Studies indicate a number of potential factors that may help to protect against negative body image or prevent negative body image. These include maintaining a healthy weight, encouraging close relationships with others, improving well-being, and reducing any tendency to compare yourself to others. Research indicates that exercise-based interventions and psychotherapeutic interventions are effective at improving body image. Conclusion The research presented in this rapid evidence assessment indicates that there is a complicated relationship between factors such as weight, the media, relationships with others, individual factors and body image. Future research needs to identify the mechanisms under which these  3 factors combine to produce low body satisfaction. Such research will help improve our understanding of how the different aspects of body image combine to cause low body satisfaction and will facilitate efforts to improve body image.  4 1. Introduction What is the policy context for this review? The Government is concerned that people – men, women and children – suffer from negative feelings about their body image and this can influence their wellbeing and self-esteem, with damaging impacts on physical and mental health. As a response, the Government launched the body confidence campaign which has three broad aims: To promote a wider spectrum of body shapes in popular culture to include all shapes and sizes, ages and ethnicities; To give people the tools they need to critically assess the images around them; To encourage people to recognise that emotional qualities – character and individuality – are equally expressive of beauty as physical appearance. In order to inform the policy behind the campaign and target intervention most effectively, the government wants to better understand: The causes of negative body image – this may include, but is not limited to societal factors (such as the media or peer influence) and individual factors (such as a lack of individual resilience); The impacts of negative body image – who is impacted and how; The potential interventions – to protect against negative body image, prevent negative body image or improve body image. This rapid evidence assessment has been commissioned to answer these questions and inform the Government’s body confidence campaign going forwards. What is body image? The ‘body image’ literature generally incorporates two themes. 1. Body perception. This is an individual’s assessment of the physical aspects of their body and the extent to which this assessment is accurate. In extreme cases individuals suffer from body dysmorphic disorder (BDD), a psychological disorder related to eating disorders whereby individuals have very inaccurate perceptions of their body size. 2. Body satisfaction. This is the extent to which an individual is content with their body size and shape. Incorporated into this theme are terms such as body confidence, body esteem, and body dissatisfaction. The term ‘body image’ can therefore refer to either body perception or body satisfaction. This rapid evidence assessment will use the same terms as those found in the literature, moving from body image to body satisfaction to body perception as a reflection of the terms used in the research papers that are being discussed. Where necessary clarification will be given as to whether the paper is discussing body perception or body satisfaction. Most of the literature on body image is focused on whole body size, shape and satisfaction.  5 Consequently most of the research focuses on body weight, body mass, muscle mass, or overall body satisfaction rather than specific areas of the body such as skin tone, facial features, body hair, or other aspects of appearance. Where a research paper focuses on a specific aspect of body image (e.g. muscle mass rather than weight) this will be specified. How is body image measured? Many of the papers in this review use a body image ‘score’. This score can reflect body perception (how accurately someone assesses their size or weight) or body satisfaction (how satisfied someone is with their body). If body image is not accurately measured then this will have an adverse impact on the accuracy of the findings. There are a number of different techniques for measuring this body image score, including: 1. Self-report questionnaire. These scales include the Body Shape Questionnaire1, Body Esteem Scale2 and the Body Shape Satisfaction Scale3. A low score on these scales would indicate inaccurate body perception or low levels of body satisfaction. These scales are generally well established and have been subjected to a number of tests to assess their reliability and validity. The use of different scales to measure body image can make it difficult for researchers who are reviewing the research as it is difficult to compare data when different scales are used. 2. Figure drawings. Typically when using this method a participant is presented with a series of drawings of body shape and asked to identify their ‘ideal’ body shape or the body shape that they feel best reflects their actual body shape. A low score using this measure would indicate inaccurate body perception or low levels of body satisfaction4. 3. Actual body weight and shape. An additional strand of data collection in this field is to gain accurate body shape and weight measurements for each participant. Some research studies use physical examinations by trained medical professionals to gain accurate body weight and shape data whereas others rely on participant self-report on their weight and height. Whilst the latter option is a much more convenient method of data collection research has shown that self-report measures can be inaccurate with 35-48% of obese participants under-reporting their weight on self-report measures5 . Previous reviews of the literature There have been a number of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the area. This rapid evidence assessment identified 22 systematic reviews or meta-analyses on body image. These have mostly focused on the impact of the media on body image, differences in body image across 1 Cooper, P., Taylor, M., Cooper, Z., & Fairbum, C. (1987). The development and validation of the body shape questionnaire, International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6(4), 485-494. 2 Franzoi, S. & Shields, S. (1984). The body esteem scale: Multidimensional structure and sex differences in a college population, Journal of Personality Development, 48(2), 173-178. 3 Slade, P., Dewey, M., Newton, T., Brodie, D., & Kiemle, G. (1990). Development and preliminary validation of the body satisfaction scale (BSS), Psychology and Health, 4(3), 213-220. 4 E.g. Gardner, R., Jappe, L., & Gardner, L. (2009). Development and validation of a new figural drawing scale for body- image assessment: the BIAS-BD. Journal Of Clinical Psychology, 65(1), 113-122. 5 Rastmanesh, R., Gluck, M., & Shadman, Z. (2009). Comparison of body dissatisfaction and cosmetic rhinoplasty with levels of veil practicing in Islamic women. The International Journal Of Eating Disorders, 42(4), 339-345.  6 gender and race, the impact of other people (such as parents and peers) on body image, and interventions to improve body image. These meta-analyses identify a number of methodological problems with previous research including: low sample sizes, insufficient information provided in research reports, the use of different scales to measure body image, an over-reliance on correlational studies, and a lack of breadth when sampling which means that much of the research has been conducted on younger people (Filiault and Drummond, 2009; Menzel et al., 2010). All of these meta-analyses and systematic reviews are included in this rapid evidence assessment, along with all of the individual studies that met the selection criteria (see Appendix A). Methodological challenges The research exploring the potential causes of negative body image is heavily dominated by studies that rely on correlational data rather than experimental design. A typical study will identify a correlation between body image scores and some other factor such as depression. This type of study will state that people with low body satisfaction have higher levels of depression. The problem with this type of research design is that it is not possible to identify causal relationships. For example, whilst many studies identify a relationship between low body satisfaction and increased depression they are unable to identify whether low body satisfaction causes increased depression, increased depression causes low body satisfaction, or that body satisfaction and depression are both aspects of one core construct such as overall ‘low mental well-being’. The literature is therefore dominated by research papers that identify links between body image and other constructs, but there is less robust information available that isolates the causes or consequences of negative body image. A number of papers explore which groups in society are more likely to have negative body image. These studies generally use surveys to establish the prevalence and differences in body image between different groups. Certain groups in society have been the subject of far more research than others. A great deal of research has been conducted on adolescents; comparatively little research has been conducted on body image in later adulthood. Similarly more research has been conducted on women than men, with non-White men being the subject of very little body image research. Eight studies that evaluated interventions to improve body image met the selection criteria for this rapid evidence assessment. Whilst these studies are of good quality the low number of studies included in the review indicates that many evaluations are conducted with low sample sizes and/or less robust research designs and therefore did not meet the selection criteria. Limitations of this rapid evidence assessment The aim of this rapid evidence assessment was to provide a short overview of the body image literature over a significant time period using the most robust and relevant research available. As such, a large body of research is not included, as it did not meet the selection criteria (see Appendix A). Additionally, this rapid evidence assessment suffers with the same limitations as  7 previous literature reviews, including: an over-reliance on correlational studies, a lack of research on certain populations, and insufficient information provided in some research papers. The findings presented throughout this report are based on the best evidence available. However, given the limitations outlined above it should be noted that the findings are sometimes based on a small number of research articles, albeit of very good quality. The findings should be read with these limitations in mind. Main themes in the literature: associations, impacts, interventions Topics identified in the literature include: Factors associated with negative body image including: weight, social causes, the impact of images portrayed in the media, and individual psychological factors that may contribute to lower body satisfaction. Who is impacted by negative body image including: gender, age, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. Interventions to either protect against negative body image, prevent negative body image or improve body image including: physical exercise programmes, education programmes and psychotherapeutic programmes.  8 2. What is associated with body image? As outlined in chapter one of this rapid evidence assessment, the body image literature is dominated by correlational studies which are able to identify a relationship between two factors but are not able to reliably infer causation. This section explores these relationships and where possible identifies the factors that may cause low body satisfaction, or be a consequence of low body satisfaction. These include: body weight, the media, individual psychological factors, other people, socio-economic status, genetic links, cosmetic surgery, health behaviours and suicide. Body weight Key findings Individuals who are overweight are more likely to have lower body satisfaction than individuals who are normal weight. All the studies that explored the relationship between body image and body weight found that increased weight was associated with lower body satisfaction. Body weight was found to be the strongest predictor of negative body image regardless of gender or ethnicity (Xanthopoulos et al., 2011). The research suggests that overweight people are more prone to low body satisfaction compared to people of normal weight. Individuals who are obese are particularly likely to have low body satisfaction (Goldfield et al., 2010). Due to the methodology that can be used when studying the relationship between body weight and body image none of the studies are able to provide evidence that increased body weight causes lower body satisfaction, or lower body satisfaction causes increased body weight. It is possible that for some individuals an increase in body weight is associated with social pressure to lose weight which leads to a reduction in body satisfaction (Cafri et al., 2005). For other individuals low body satisfaction may lead to ineffective or unhealthy dieting behaviours that result in weight gain (Goldfield et al., 2011). Description of the literature: This rapid evidence assessment did not include a review of the obesity literature as it was outside the scope. Seven papers that explored the relationship between weight and body image met the selection criteria (Caccavale, Farhat, and Iannotti, 2012; Forrest and Stuhldreher, 2007; Goldfield et al., 2010; Holsen, Carlson Jones, and Skogbrott, 2012; O’Dea and Caputi, 2001; Paxton, Eisenberg, and Neurnark-Sztainer, 20061; Xanthopoulos et al., 2011). All of these studies were correlational studies using self-report data on body satisfaction and weight status (often assessed using BMI). The sample sizes used ranged from 1131 to 6909 with two of the studies (Holsen et al., 2012; Paxton et al., 20061) using a longitudinal design that explored the relationship between weight and body image over a five to seventeen year period. Most of the studies were conducted with young people or university age participants. The media Key findings Watching images of thin women or muscly men can reduce body satisfaction.  9 The impact of media images is not universal, some people are unaffected by media images. The impact of media images depends on the extremity of the images used and the amount of pre-existing low body satisfaction in the viewer. One of the areas that has received a great deal of research attention is the impact of the media on body image. This area typically explores the impact of images of thin and attractive women, or men with well-defined muscles, on those viewing them. The extent to which these images relate to the ‘media’ varies between studies. Some studies use commercials and advertisements from the media and assess the impact of these images on their participants. Other studies use images of ‘idealised body shapes’ but do not source these images directly from the media. Other methods include asking participants to estimate how many hours of media coverage they view each week and then relating this to body satisfaction, or asking participants how much pressure they feel the media places on them to have a perfect body shape. The majority of research indicates that exposure to idealised body images can result in a small to moderate reduction in body satisfaction and body perception (e.g. Grabe, Ward, & Hyde 2008). This is a finding that has been reproduced in many studies using both male and female participants (e.g. Barlett, Vowels, & Saucier, 2008). However, this finding is not universal. Some studies have failed to replicate the finding and have instead found that exposure to idealised body images has the same impact as being exposed to images of inanimate objects (e.g. pictures of homes and gardens, Holmstrom, 2004). For women who are only slightly bigger than the models used in the media, exposure to media images improved their body satisfaction (Holstrom, 2004). It is suggested that for these women exposure to thin images may act as a motivational factor to help maintain lower weight. Another important factor is the extremity of the images used. Barlett et al. (2008) only found a relationship between idealised body images and low body satisfaction when extreme images were used (e.g. very muscular men). In addition, any pre-existing low body satisfaction in the participants appears to have an impact on the results. Individuals who already have low body satisfaction are likely to be negatively affected by images of idealised body shapes whereas individuals who have high body satisfaction are unlikely to be affected by images of idealised body shapes (Blond, 2008; Want, 2009). Description of the literature: This area has more individual studies published so it has also been the subject of a larger number of meta-analyses in comparison to the other topic areas covered in this rapid evidence assessment. As a consequence this section summarises the main findings from these meta-analyses rather than seeking to replicate this work. Six meta-analyses exploring the relationship between the media and body image were found (Barlett, Vowels, and Saucier, 2008; Blond, 2008; Grabe, Ward, and Hyde, 2008; Groesz, Levine, and Murnen, 2002; Holmstrom, 2004; Want 2009). Three of these meta-analyses explored the impact of the media on body image for women (Grabe et al., 2008; Groesz et al., 2002; Want, 2009), two on men (Bartlett et al., 2008; Blond, 2008) and one on both men and women (Holstrom, 2004). In general the research studies that were reviewed relied on self- report assessment of volume and nature of media consumption which was then correlated with body image measures, or experimental design using exposure to different types of media and measuring the consequent impact on body image. Methodological problems with the research in this field include use of different scales to measure body image and media use, small sample sizes and a reliance on correlational studies. Reported sample sizes ranged from 1085 to 4324.  10 Individual psychological factors Key findings Low body satisfaction is linked with low self-esteem and depression. Individuals who have low body satisfaction are more likely to also have low self- esteem or depression if they are female or overweight. People who have certain psychological patterns, such as believing they should have perfect bodies or an increased tendency to compare themselves to others, are more likely to have low body satisfaction. Many of the studies that found a link between negative body image (both body satisfaction and body perception) and depression were conducted with adolescents. The relationship between depression and body image was found for both girls (Pesa et al., 2000) and boys (Cohane et al., 2001), although girls are more likely to experience depression along with negative body image than boys (e.g. Sujoldzić, et al., 2007). Adolescents who are overweight are more likely to experience low body satisfaction and depression (Chaiton et al., 2009). Research indicates that low body satisfaction may be the link that explains this association between weight and depression. Pesa et al. (2000) found that there was no statistical relationship between weight and depression when the influence of body satisfaction scores was controlled, implying that body image is important in understanding the relationship between weight and depression. In terms of other psychological factors that are related to body image, Izgiç, Akyüz, Dogcaron, and Kugcaron (2004) found that individuals who had previously suffered from a social phobia were at increased risk of suffering from lower body image. Cafri, Yamamiya, Brannick, and Thompson (2005) found that ‘internalising the thin idea’ (taking on board societal thin ideals as standards for yourself) were key components of negative body image. Increased levels of social comparison (an increased tendency to evaluate yourself by comparing yourself to others) is linked to an increased risk of low body satisfaction (Myers and Crowther, 2009). Description of the literature: Twenty two articles that met the selection criteria for this rapid evidence assessment provided data on individual psychological factors associated with body image. These factors may be causes of lower body satisfaction, consequences of lower body satisfaction, or aspects of a larger phenomenon of which low body satisfaction is also a characteristic. The studies are made up of three systematic reviews, six longitudinal studies, and twelve cross-sectional survey studies. Fourteen of the studies identify a relationship between ‘negative affect’ and low body satisfaction. These studies identified a relationship between low self-esteem, reduced emotional well-being, or increased depression and low body satisfaction (Chaiton et al., 2009; Cohane and Pope, 2001; Delfabbro et al., 2011; El Ansari et al., 2011; Fenton, Brooks, Spencer, and Morgan, 2010; Gavin, Simon, and Ludman, 2010; McCabe, Ricciardelli, and Banfield, 2001; Mond et al., 2011; Morin, et al., 2011; Paxton, Eisenberg, and Neurnark- Sztainer, 20061; Pesa, Syre, and Jones, 2000; Pimenta, Bes-Rastrollo, and Lapez, 2009; Sujoldzić and De Lucia, 2007; Xie et al., 2010). Sample sizes ranged from 806 to 4543. Other people  11 Key findings Parents influence the body satisfaction of their children both positively and negatively. Individuals who sense a general social pressure to have an ideal body shape are likely to feel worse about their bodies. People who have lower body satisfaction are likely to experience teasing. Parents and peers In a study that explored the interaction between parental and peer relationships with body satisfaction Holsen et al. (2012) found that good quality relationships with parents and peers were associated with higher body satisfaction whereas poor quality relationships with parents and peers were associated with lower body satisfaction. The quality of these relationships also predicted body satisfaction over time, with individuals who had good quality relationships in childhood also experiencing higher body satisfaction in adulthood. Many authors highlight the importance of the role of parents when considering any attempts to improve body image amongst young people. Mothers and fathers are able to influence body image in positive directions through words of encouragement and negative directions through criticism (Rodgers et al., 2009). This is especially the case for girls (Crespo et al., 2010; van den Berg et al., 2010). Parents are also able to influence the body satisfaction of their children by acting as role models. In a study focusing on the impact of mothers’ attitudes towards their own bodies van den Berg et al. (2010) found that mothers who are concerned about their weight are more likely to have daughters who are dissatisfied with their bodies and more likely to have both daughters and sons who try to control their weight. Societal pressure A general sense that society will only accept you if you have an ‘ideal’ body shape is also related to low body satisfaction. Individuals who feel pressurised by society to achieve an ideal body are more likely to have lower body satisfaction than individuals who do not feel pressurised (Cafri et al., 2005). Girls appear to be more likely to feel pressurised to have an ideal body than boys (Esnaola et al., 2010) and will often ‘internalise’ this pressure so that they are placing pressure on themselves rather than simply responding to perceived pressure from others. Teasing Individuals who have low body satisfaction are likely to say that they have been teased about their bodies. Children are more likely to say they have been teased than adults, and females are more likely to say they have been teased than males. However, it is not clear whether children and females experience more teasing than others, or whether they are more affected by the teasing they experience (Lunde et al., 2007; Menzel et al., 2010). Description of the literature: Eleven individual studies explored the role of other people on individual body image. These studies explored a range of issues including the role of general perceived societal pressure to achieve an ideal body shape (Cafri, Yamamiya, Brannick, and Thompson, 2005; Esnaola, Rodríguez, and Goñi, 2010), the role of teasing on body satisfaction (Lunde, Frisén, and Hwang, 2007; Menzel et al. 2010; Paxton, Eisenberg, and Neurnark-Sztainer, 20062), and the role of parents and peers on body satisfaction (Crespo, Kielpikowski, Jose, and Pryor, 2010; Holsen et al., 2012; Kelly, 2005; Rodgers and Chabrol, 2009; Thatcher and Rhea, 2003; van den Berg,  12 Keery, Eisenberg, and Neumark-Sztainer, 2010). The sample sizes used in the studies ranged from 874 to 4746. Socio-economic status Key findings In comparison to children with higher socio-economic status, children of lower socio-economic status are more likely to be overweight, but also more likely to perceive themselves as weighing less than they actually do. Girls from middle to upper socio-economic status groups are likely to have the lowest body satisfaction. Children with lower socio-economic status are more likely to be overweight than children from middle to higher socio-economic status groups but are also more likely to perceive themselves as weighing less than they actually do (O’Dea et al., 2001). This suggests that children of lower socio-economic status groups may be more likely to misperceive their body image in a way that encourages them to remain over-weight. O’Dea et al. found that the group with the lowest body satisfaction overall were girls from middle to upper socio-economic status groups. Description of the literature: Three studies explored the relationship between socio-economic status and body image; two focused on young people (O’Dea et al., 2001; Paxton et al., 20061) and one on older adults (Gavin, Simon, and Ludman, 2010). The sample sizes ranged from 1113 to 4543. Genetic links Key findings There appears to be a stronger genetic link for some aspects of body satisfaction for females in comparison to males. The ability to accurately estimate body size is associated with a genetic link. Choice of ideal body size appears to be more influenced by environmental factors than genetic factors. Twin studies compare data from monozygotic twins (identical twins with approximate 99% gene match) and dizygotic twins (non-identical twins with approximately 50% genetic match) to identify the impact of genetic match over environmental factors such as parenting styles. These studies can indicate whether a trait is associated with ‘nature’ (genes – assessed using monozygotic twins) or ‘nurture’ (the environment – assessed using dizygotic twins). Studies using twins to explore the link between genes and body image found that females appear to have a stronger genetic link to body image than males. Specifically the ability to accurately estimate your own body size appears to be associated with a genetic link to body image. However, when asked to identify an ideal body shape participants were more influenced by environmental factors (such as the media or pressure from other people) than genes. This implies that body perception is perhaps more linked to genetic factors than overall body image.  13 Given the small number of studies that have explored the genetic link with body image and the mixed findings of these studies, overall it is unclear whether there is a genetic component to body image. Description of the literature: Two studies exploring the impact of genetics on body image met the selection criteria for this review. Both of these studies (Keski-Rahkonen et al., 2005; and Wade et al., 2001) used large samples (N=4667 and N=10650 respectively) of twins and explored the relationship between genetic factors and environmental factors on body image by examining differences between Monozygotic (identical twins with approximate 99% gene match) and Dizygotic (non-identical twins with approximately 50% genetic match) twins. Cosmetic surgery Key findings Individuals who have low body satisfaction are more likely to have favourable attitudes to certain types of cosmetic surgery. People are more likely to be interested in having cosmetic surgery if they have low body satisfaction (Javo & Sørlie, 2010; Menzel et al., 2011). The relationship between body satisfaction and interest in cosmetic surgery appears to vary depending on the nature of the cosmetic surgery. Individuals who are interested in cosmetic procedures to reduce body size (e.g. liposuction) tend to be of higher weight and report lower body satisfaction than those who favour other types of cosmetic surgery (e.g. rhinoplasty) (Frederick, Lever, & Peplau, 2007). There appears to be a relationship between reality TV cosmetic surgery shows and body image with viewers of these programmes more likely to have low body satisfaction and more favourable attitudes towards cosmetic surgery (Sperry, Thompson, Sarwer, & Cash, 2009). The correlational nature of this study means that it is not possible to determine whether viewing these programmes changed body image and attitudes to cosmetic surgery, or whether people choose to watch these types of programmes because they already have negative body image and a positive attitude to cosmetic surgery. Certain religious practices may limit the desire for cosmetic surgery. In a study exploring the relationship between veil wearing and body image Islamic women who regularly wear a veil have improved body image and lower interest in cosmetic surgery than Islamic women who wear veils less often (Tastmanesh, Gluck, & Shadman, 2009). Description of the literature: The five studies that explored the relationship between cosmetic surgery and body image were all cross-sectional survey designs with sample sizes ranging from to 1771 to 52677. The studies generally explored attitudes towards cosmetic surgery and the relationship with body image. Health behaviours Key findings Negative body image is linked to eating disorder symptoms, unhealthy weight control behaviours, and risky sexual practices.  14 Low body satisfaction may act as a barrier to quitting smoking Girls who mis-perceive their actual body shape or size, and estimate that they are heavier than their actual weight, are more likely to use extreme weight control behaviours such as vomiting (Liechty, 2010). Lower body satisfaction appears to increase the chances of adolescents using unhealthy weight control behaviours (such as crash dieting) that are likely to result in weight gain and poorer overall health (Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2006). These papers all indicate that body image may have a key role in predicting risk of eating disorder behaviour. In relation to sexual health, women with lower body satisfaction are more likely to be inconsistent with safer-sex practices (e.g. using a condom), more likely to have had multiple sex partners in the past year, and more likely to have had sex after drinking alcohol or using drugs in comparison to women with higher body satisfaction (Littleton, Radecki, Britkopf, & Berenson, 2005). Smokers are more pre-occupied with their weight than non-smokers. Fear of weight gain may prevent people from trying to quit smoking therefore body image (both body perception and body satisfaction) may play a role in supporting continued smoking (Clark et al., 2005). Description of the literature: This rapid evidence assessment did not include papers that were exclusively focused on eating disorders or body dysmorphic disorder. However three papers met the selection criteria and explored the relationship between body image and unhealthy eating, weight, and other health related factors amongst non-eating- disordered individuals. These studies had sample sizes between 1547 and 5173. Two studies were repeated measures longitudinal surveys (Liechty, 2010; Neumark-Sztainer et al., 2006), the other was a non-repeated measure survey (Littleton et al., 2005). Three studies that met the criteria for this review explored the relationship between smoking and body image (Clark et al., 2005; Croghan et al., 2006, and Kaufmann & Augustson, 2008). These articles tended to explore the relationship from the smoking, rather than body image, perspective and therefore their findings have limited relevance to this review. The sample sizes ranged from 1456 to 6956. Suicide Key findings Individuals with low body satisfaction may be more likely to report that they have thought about killing themselves or have attempted suicide. The relationship between body image and suicide varies depending on age and physical development. There is a mixture of findings relating body image to suicide. Some studies have found no relationship between body satisfaction and suicide (e.g. Crow, Eisenberg, Story, & Neumark- Sztainer, 20081). Other studies have found a link between reduced body satisfaction and reported suicide attempts (Crow, Eisenberg, Story, & Neumark-Sztainer, 20082; Rodríguez-Cano, Beato- Fernández, & Llario, 2006). An important factor in the relationship between body satisfaction and suicide may be the presence of extreme weight control behaviours (such as vomiting). Both of the studies that explored the relationship between extreme weight control behaviours and suicide found that an